NettetIn Holder v. Humanitarian Law Project (2010), the U.S. Supreme Court held that the act’s definition of “material support” as including expert advice or assistance did not violate the freedoms of speech and association. Read More NettetHolder v. Humanitarian Law Project - 561 U.S. 1, 130 S. Ct. 2705 (2010) Rule: A conviction fails to comport with due process if the statute under which it is obtained fails to provide a person of ordinary intelligence fair notice of what is prohibited, or is so standardless that it authorizes or encourages seriously discriminatory enforcement.
Humanitarian Law Project
NettetHolder v. Humanitarian Law Project PETITIONER:Eric H. Holder, Jr., Attorney General, et al. RESPONDENT:Humanitarian Law Project, et al. LOCATION:U.S. Capitol Building DOCKET NO.: 08-1498 DECIDED BY: Roberts Court (2009-2010) LOWER COURT: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit CITATION: 561 US 1 (2010) … NettetHOLDER v. HUMANITARIAN LAW PROJECT 3 First Amendment claims that the new term was substantially overbroad and criminalized associational speech. . . . The parties cross-appealed. While the cross-appeals were pending, the Ninth Circuit granted en banc rehearing of the panel’s 2003 decision in plaintiffs’ first tibbetts group banbury
Holder v. Humanitarian Law Project Center for …
NettetThe Humanitarian Law Project (HLP), five other organizations, and two individuals (collectively Plaintiffs) filed suit in district court against U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder, Jr., and others (collectively Defendants) challenging the constitutionality of a federal law that prohibited the giving of “material support or resources” to certain … Nettet23. feb. 2010 · Eric H. Holder, Jr., Attorney General, et al. Respondent Humanitarian Law Project, et al. Location U.S. Capitol Building Docket no. 08-1498 Decided by Roberts … Nettet8. aug. 2024 · To make matters more complicated, material support is defined somewhat differently in counterterrorism law than immigration law, and Executive Orders imposing sanctions on listed groups do not define it at all. The 2010 Supreme Court case Holder v. Humanitarian Law Project further muddied the waters. tibbettsgroup.com